افزایش راندمان رسوب‌شویی تحت‌فشار مخزن سد با استفاده از سازۀ اتاقک رسوب

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد منابع آب و عضو بنیاد ملی نخبگان، گروه مهندسی آب، پردیس ابوریحان، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

در چند دهۀ اخیر به‌‌دلیل افزایش جمعیت و نیاز فزاینده به آب، سدسازی توسعه پیدا کرده است، اما رسوب­ گذاری داخل مخازن سد‌ها همواره باعث کاهش کارایی و طول عمر مخازن بوده است. در این تحقیق، با نصب سازه منشوری شکل به‌نام اتاقک رسوب در جلو تخلیه‌کنندۀ تحتانی، تأثیر این سازه بر راندمان رسوب­شویی تحت‌ فشار بررسی شده است. در این سازه، در دیواره جلویی و کناری آن، شکاف ­های عمودی با عرض بازشدگی (b)، تعداد و آرایش مختلف (موقعیت) تعبیه گردید. شکاف ­ها در سه حالت تکی، دوتایی و سه‌تایی با بازشدگی­ های 1.25-7.5 سانتی­متر (0.25، 0.5، 1 و 1.5 =b/D و D قطر دریچه تخلیه) انتخاب شدند. نتایج آزمایش ­ها نشان داد که در مدل­های دو شکاف جلویی با مجموع بازشدگی 5 سانتی­متر (1= b/D)، با افزایش فاصلۀ شکاف ­ها راندمان رسوب­ شویی به‌‌میزان 100 درصد افزایش می­یابد. همچنین، در مدل­ های دو شکاف کناری متقارن با مجموع بازشدگی 5 سانتی­متر (1= b/D)، با فاصله گرفتن شکاف­ ها از دیواره کناری مخزن، راندمان رسوب­شویی به‌میزان 50 درصد افزایش می­ یابد. در مدل­ های سه شکاف متقارن با مجموع بازشدگی 5 سانتی­متر (1=b/D)، افزایش تعداد شکاف­ ها نتوانست راندمان رسوب­شویی را افزایش دهد. در مدل­ های دو شکاف ترکیبی (ترکیب یک شکاف در دیوار جلویی با یک شکاف در دیوار کناری) با مجموع بازشدگی 5 سانتی­متر (1=b/D)، راندمان رسوب­ شویی افزایش چشمگیری نشان داد به‌طوری‌که راندمان رسوب­ شویی در این مدل، نسبت به مدل دو شکاف کناری متقارن تا 50 درصد افزایش نشان داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Enhancement the Pressurized Flushing Efficiency of Dam Reservoir Using Sediment Chamber Structure

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ghorban Mahtabi 1
  • Saeed Mozafari 2
1 Assistant Professor, Water Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran. Email: ghmahtabi@gmail.com
2 MSc Student in Water Resources, Water Engineering Department, Pardis-e Abureyhan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
 

Introduction
In the recent decades, Dams construction have been developed due to increasing of population and growing need for water. However, sediment deposition inside the reservoirs has always caused to reduce the efficiency and the life time of the reservoirs. Several methods by which the life enhancement of storage reservoir can be made are: watershed management, dredging, flushing of sediments from reservoir, sediment routing/sluicing, sediment bypassing and density current venting; these methods are used independently or in combination (Breusers et al., 1982). Sediment flushing is a technique whereby previously accumulated and deposited sediments in a reservoir were hydraulically eroded and removed by accelerated flows generated by opening the bottom outlets of the dam. Flushing sediments through a reservoir has been used for a long time and has been practiced successfully and found to be inexpensive in many cases (Atkinson, 1996; Fruchard & Camenen, 2012). However, the engineers are generally interested in implementing the applicable measures for increasing the sediment removal from these reservoirs which encounters the excess deposition problems. In this study, by installing a prismatic structure named "sediment chamber" in front of the bottom outlet, the effects of this structure on increasing the pressurized flushing efficiency were investigated.
 
 
Methodology
The experimental setup consisted of an elevated rectangular tank for the reservoir (1.5 * 1 * 1.2m) and for the sump. The reservoir was 1.5m long, 1 m wide, and 1.2m deep. The diameter of circular orifice of reservoir outlet was D= 5 cm. The bottom outlet center was 30 cm above the reservoir floor. The reservoir drained into the sump through the orifice and the flow was re-circulated from there. The space between the bottom outlet invert and the reservoir bed was filled with sediment. Non-cohesive sediment (sand with median size 0.51 mm) was used. A prismatic structure named the "sediment chamber" in front of the bottom outlet was used to increase the pressurized flushing efficiency. In front and side walls of this structure,  vertical slots with different opening width (b), number and arrangement (position) were considered. Slits were selected in three modes of single, binary and triple with 1.25-7.5 cm openings (b/D=0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and D= the outlet diameter). The tests were conducted under two constant head of 20 and 30 cm above the bottom outlet. The
tests were run until the bed topography reached equilibrium state, involving negligible sediment motion within the scour hole. The test duration lasted 1 hour. At the end of each test, the transported sediments were collected and weighed after drying in the oven.
 
Results and Discussion
Experimental results showed that in models with two front slot and a total opening of 5 cm (b/D=1), the flushing efficiency showed a 100% increase with increasing of slot distance. Also in models with two symmetrical side slots and a total opening of 5 cm (b/D=1), with going away the slots from the side wall of the sediment tank, the flushing efficiency increased by 50%. In the models with three symmetric slots and a total opening of 5 cm (b/D=1), increasing the number of slots could not increase the flushing efficiency. In the models with two combined slots (a slot in the front wall with a slot in the side wall) with a total openings of 5 cm(b/D=1), the flushing efficiency showed a significant increase, so that the flushing efficiency of this model showed a 50% increase with respect to the models with two symmetrical side slots.
 
Conclusions
In this study, the effects of a prismatic structure, sediment chamber, in front of the bottom outlet on increasing the pressurized flushing efficiency was investigated. The results showed that the model with two combined slots (combination of a slot in the front wall and a slot in the side wall) with a total openings of 5 cm (b/D=1) had the best performance of sediment flushing and increased the flushing efficiency more than 21 times, compared to the control model.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bottom Outlet
  • flushing
  • Slot arrangement
  • Vortex Flow
Abdolahpour, M., & Hosseinzadeh-Dalir, A. (2013). Effect of semi-cylinder structure position on pressurized flushing efficiency of reservoirs. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 23(2), 269-282. (in Persian)
 
Amirjani, R., Kamanbedast, A., Heydarnejad, M., Bordbar A., & Masjedi, A. (2019). Investigation of the effect of the kind of sediments and the change in the bottom outlet form using a semi-cylinder structure on the score cone by a physical model. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 22(4), 85-97. (in Persian)
 
Althous, J. (2011). Sediment evacuation from reservoirs through intakes by jet induced flow (Ph. D. Thesis) Ecole polytechnique Federale De Lausanne, Switzerland.
 
Atkinson, E. (1996). Flushing sediment from reservoirs: RESFLUSH user manual. Report OD/ITM 54. HR Wallingford. UK.
 
Breusers, H. N. C., Klaassen, G. J., Brakel, J., & Roode, F. C. (1982). Environmental impact and control of reservoir sedimentation. Fourteenth International Congress on Large Dams. Transactions. 3-7 May. Rio de Janeiro. Brazil. 3, 353-372.
 
Fan, J. (1985). Methods of Preserving Reservoir Capacity. In: Bruk, S. (editor) Methods of Computing Sedimentation in Lakes and Reservoirs, UNESCO, Paris.
 
Fang, D., & Cao, S. (1996). An experimental study on scour funnel in front of a sediment flushing outlet of a reservoir. The 6th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference. Las Vegas.
 
Fruchard, F., & Camenen, B. (2012). Reservoir sedimentation: different type of flushing-friendly flushing example of genissiat dam flushing. ICOLD International Symposium on Dams for a Changing World.
 
Karimi, S., & Mahtabi, G. (2018). Effect of radial arrangement of submerged vanes in increasing the flushing efficiency of dam reservoir. J. Water Soil Sci. (28(1):43-56. (in Persian)
 
Madadi, M.R;Rahimpour, M., Qaderi, K. (2016. Improving the reservoir’s pressurized flushing efficiency by connecting PBC structure to the dam bottom outlet. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research. 17(66): 71-86. (in Persian)
 
Mahtabi, G., Karimi, S., &  mohamadiuon, M. (2018. Effect of the number of rows, height and arrangement of submerged vanes in flushing of dam reservoir. J. Water Soil Cons. 25(1): 285-296. (in Persian)
 
Mohammadi, M. N., Salmasi, F., Hosseinzadeh-Dalir, A., & Arvanaghi, H. (2014. Experimental investigation of the effect of semi-circular structure on the capacity of pressurized flushing of sediments from the reservoirs. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 24(2), 21-30. (in Persian)
 
Morris, G. L., & Fan, J. (2009). Reservoir Sedimentation Handbook: Design and Management of Dams,Reservoirs and Watershed for Sustainable Use. McGraw Hill. New York.
 
Powell, D. N., & Khan, A. (2015). Flow field upstream of an orifice under fixed bed and equilibrium scour conditions. Journal of Hydraulic Eng.ineering, 141(2), 267-283.
 
Rasouli, A. A., Bordbar, A., Kamanbedast,A. A., Masjedi, A., & Heidarnejad M. (2019). Effect of sediments type on scour cone in pressure flushing. Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Sci. Eng. 13(44), 83-89. (in Persian)
 
Samadi-Rahim, A. (2011). Experimental investigation of the effect of number and shape of bottom outlets on the size of flushing cone and the performance of pressure flushing in storage dams (M. Sc. Thesis) Faculty of Agriculture. Tarbiat Modares University. Tehran. Iran. (in Persian)
 
Tofighi, S., Samani, J. M. V., & Ayyubzadeh, S. A. (2015). Pressure flushing with expanding bottom outlet channel within dam reservoir. Modares Civil Engineering Journal, 15(2), 127-206. (in Persian)
 
White, R. (2000). Flushing of Sediments from Reservoirs. ICOLD. World Register of Large Dams. HR Wallingford. UK.