نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد سازه های آبی دانشگاه لرستان
2 استادیار گروه مهندسی آب دانشگاه لرستان
3 دانشگاه لرستان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Differences in the flow properties in the main channel and flood plains causes, mass and momentum tensions between the both sections. The non-prismatic compound open channel cross section intensifies the mass and momentum transferring between the main channel and floodplains and has significant effect on the flow properties through the compound open channel. In this study the flow properties in the heterogeneous Roughness Non-Prismatic Compound Open Channel was assessed using the numerical and physical modeling. The physical modeling was conducted in the hydraulic laboratory center of Tehran University and numerical modeling was carried out using the Flow-3D as famous computation fluid dynamic tool (CFD).The results indicates that the Flow-3D is an effective tool for modeling the flow in the heterogeneous roughness non-prismatic compound open channel. During the CFD modeling it was found that the RNG turbulence model is more precise for simulation and modeling the flow properties. The results show that the heterogeneous roughness has significant effect on the flow characteristics such as velocity distribution and share stress gradient.
کلیدواژهها [English]
Bousmar, D. and Zech, Y. 2004. Velocity distribution in non-prismatic compound channels. Water Manage. 157(WM2): 99-108.
Bousmar, D., Proust, S. and Zech, Y. 2006. Experiments on the flow in a enlarging compound channel. Proceedings of the International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics. Sep. 6-8. Lisbon. Portugal.
Dehdar-Behbahani, S. and Parsaie, A. 2016. Numerical modeling of flow pattern in dam spillway’s guide wall. Case study: Balaroud dam. Iran. Alexandria Eng. J. 55, 467-473.
Hirt, C. W. and Nichols, B. D. 1981. Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of freeboundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 39, 201-225.
Knight, D. W. and Demetriou, J. D. 1983. Flood plain and main channel flow interaction. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE. 109(8): 1073-1092.
Knight, D. W. and Hamed, M. E. 1984. Boundary shear in symmetrical compound channels. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE. 110(10): 1412-1429.
Mohanta, A., Khatua, K. K. and Patra, K. C. 2015. Flow modeling in symmetrically narrowing flood plains. Aquatic Procedia. 4, 826-833.
Naik, B., Khatua, K., Sahoo, R. and Satapathy, S. S. 2014. Flow analysis for a converging compound channel. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 9(2): 133-138.
Othman, F. and Valentine, E. M. 2006. Numerical modelling of the velocity distribution in a compound channel. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 54(3): 269-279.
Parsaie, A. 2016. Analyzing the distribution of momentum and energy coefficients in compound open channel. Modeling Earth Sys. Environ. 2, 1-5.
Parsaie, A., Haghiabi, A. H. and Moradinejad, A. 2015. CFD modeling of flow pattern in spillway’s approach channel. Sustain. Water Resour. Manage. 1, 245-251.
Proust, S., Bousmar, D., Rivière, N., Paquier, A. and Zech, Y. 2010. Energy losses in compound open channels. Adv. Water Resour. 33, 1-16.
Rezaei, B. and Knight, D. W. 2009. Application of the Shiono and Knight Method in compound channels with non-prismatic floodplains. J. Hydraul. Res. 47(6): 716-726.
Rezaei, B. and Knight, D. W. 2011. Overbank Flow in compound channels with non-prismatic floodplains. J. Hydraul. Eng. 137(8): 815-824.
Sellin, R. H. J. 1964. A laboratory investigation into the interaction between the flow in the channel of a river and that over its flood plain. La Houille Blanche. 7, 793-802.
Shiono, K. and Knight, D. W. 1991. Turbulent open-channel flows with variable depth across the channel. J. Fluid Mech. 222, 617-646.
Yang, K., Cao, S. and Knight, D. W. 2007. Flow patterns in compound channels with vegetated floodplains. J. Hydraul. Eng. 133(2): 148-159.
)